Ji Sung Nam vs Marat Sharipov (RUS) Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Apr at 10:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Sung Nam vs M. Sharipov (RUS)

KOR
0
Win
Played
1
Win
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
RUS
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Nam 0 - 1 (RUS)
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ji Sung Nam winning 0 and Marat Sharipov (RUS) winning 2. The last match between Marat Sharipov (RUS) and Ji Sung Nam was at the Busan Challenger, 13-04-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Marat Sharipov (RUS) getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nam | 0 |
| (RUS) | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Busan Challenger(04-13-25)
J. S. Nam vs M. S. (RUS) H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,445 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.34% (311-241) | Career Total W/L | 65.97% (190-98) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 6 | Titles | 9 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. S. Nam vs M. S. (RUS) Match Preview:
In an analytical comparison of their recent performance, Nam has shown a 33.55% success rate on their second serve in the last six months, contrasting with (RUS), who has achieved a 45.96% win rate. This notable difference in second-serve efficiency strongly influences match outcome predictions. Furthermore, the return game statistics exhibit a marginal edge for Nam, who has secured 49.7% of points on their opponents' second serves, while (RUS) has managed to win 47.35%. However, when it comes to first-serve returns, Nam significantly outperforms, boasting a 33.05% success compared to (RUS) at 21.95%, making Nam appear favored in their head-to-head matchup.
Examining pressure-handling capabilities, Nam has saved 39.37% of breakpoints recently, whereas (RUS) has a superior breakpoint save rate of 58.96%. Breakpoint conversion statistics also reveal Nam's advantage, with a conversion rate of 46.91% compared to (RUS)'s 33.93%. Insights like these are valuable for predicting match momentum when either player faces breakpoint scenarios.
Analyzing performance from the previous year, Nam has recorded a match win rate of 52.78%, with a win/loss of 19/17, whereas (RUS) has not participated in any matches, hence a 0% win rate. On specific playing surfaces, Nam excels on Hard courts, achieving a career win percentage of 58%, though they struggle on Grass with just 33%. (RUS)'s career surface preferences remain unspecified, presenting an incomplete picture of their strengths.
Both players have faced different caliber opponents; over the last 12 months, Nam has played competitors with an average ranking of 381.5. The rank of (RUS)'s opponents wasn't disclosed, leaving a gap in analyzing opponent quality. Decision-set performance places Nam in a stronger position, having won 55% of such sets over the past year, while (RUS) remains winless.
Finally, event-specific stats provide insight into in-form players during the competition, though (RUS)'s details remain incomplete. Overall, the comprehensive analysis suggests that Nam's recent form, consistent pressure handling, and better decision-set victories position them as the likely winner in their upcoming encounter.
Ji Sung Nam vs Marat Sharipov (RUS) Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. S. Nam vs M. S. (RUS) H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:38:56 | Average Match Time | 1:38:56 |
| 63% (48/76) | 1st Serve % | 51% (37/73) |
| 56% (27/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (27/37) |
| 36% (10/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (17/36) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 40% (29/73) | Return Points Win % | 51% (39/76) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. S. Nam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(8) 6-4 7-6(6) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
M. S. (RUS) Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | ||

J. S. Nam vs M. S. (RUS) Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.34% (311/241) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.97% (190/98) |
| 55.80% (698/553) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.12% (409/239) |
| 52.37% (6070/5520) | Games Win/Loss | 55.49% (3395/2723) |
| 57.88% (257/187) | Hard Win/Loss | 73.81% (93/33) |
| 50.00% (28/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.33% (73/48) |
| 51.02% (25/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.54% (24/17) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.68 |
| 1047 | Aces Total | 2037 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 982 | Total Double Faults | 684 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:28:41 |
| 578.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 488.86 |
| 65% (14629/22558) | 1st Serve % | 58% (10194/17625) |
| 68% (9882/14629) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (7668/10194) |
| 49% (3878/7929) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3790/7431) |
| 44% (1184/2688) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (794/1927) |
| 43% (10166/23771) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7349/18122) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 50.00% (112/112) | Challenger W/L | 58.18% (32/23) |
| 61.71% (195/121) | Futures W/L | 68.10% (158/74) |
| 56% (301/536) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (186/279) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 53% (77/144) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (52/93) |
| 47% (74/156) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (45/75) |
| 86% (311/266) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (192/175) |
| 14% (311/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (192/17) |
| 19% (240/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (96/15) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
